Showing posts with label Sweden. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sweden. Show all posts

April 2, 2015

2016 Bi-Fuel Volvo V60 & V70 Unveiled: High Performance, Low Emissions

Westport launches 2016 Bi-fuel Volvo V60 and V70 in Gothenburg, Sweden


To celebrate the launch of the model year 2016 Volvo cars featuring the recently announced Drive-E featuring Westport natural gas combustion technology, Westport Sweden hosted an event March 25 and 26 at the Volvo test track in Göteburg (Gothenburg).

Ulf Möck of Volvo test drives the new 2106 bi-fuel Volvo
Ulf Möck of Volvo test drives the new 2016 bi-fuel Volvo
Volvo Cars is the first original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to feature the new Westport system. It will be used on Volvo's new two-litre, direct injection, four-cylinder Drive-E powertrain family, which will be available on the Volvo V60 and V70 2016 models.

July 9, 2013

Challenges to wider adoption of RNG for transportation

In the fifth and final post in our series on renewable natural gas (RNG), we look at some of the challenges to the widespread use of RNG for transportation.

There are promising developments in Europe and the United States that show tremendous potential for RNG in transportation. Several challenges exist, though, to commercial-scale use of RNG fuelled vehicles  including reliable feedstock availability, cost/economics of RNG production, the regulatory and policy structure, and infrastructure/fuel specification uncertainties. The first three challenges are highly interrelated, and each affects the others.

The availability of biomass feedstock is critical to expanding the use of RNG. In Europe, key factors for future supply are availability of land for RNG production[1], regulatory structures that either stimulate or inhibit growth in supply (e.g. regulations for waste water treatment and landfills), sustainability requirements (e.g. limits on land use conversions), and shifting supply-demand dynamics.[2] Competing demands for RNG, such as meeting renewable electricity generation targets, can also affect the availability and price of RNG for transportation.

The economics of RNG are driven by a number of factors, not least because RNG is a relatively new fuel type for transportation with a small market share. On the supply side, production and delivery costs to the pipeline can make it more costly than compressed natural gas (CNG), although still cheaper than gasoline and diesel, according to the analysis (below) of the California market.[3]

Source: National Petroleum Council, 2012
Without incentives, like tax treatment (e.g. Germany’s RNG processing bonus or Sweden’s energy tax deduction for CO2 neutral vehicles and RNG producers)[4], and/or some form of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions pricing that recognizes RNG’s environmental benefits, it’s challenging to develop RNG compared to lower-cost non-renewable fuels. 

The third area, regulation and policy, also has a large impact on both availability of the feedstock and the cost of producing and selling RNG. But most policies in the U.S. on renewable and low-carbon transport fuels favour liquid biofuels.  And the renewable portfolio standards (RPS) in roughly 30 U.S. states (along with other incentives for renewable power) tend to direct RNG to electricity generation instead of transportation.  Europe has a clear path for developing renewable sources over the long term via its Energy and Transportation Roadmaps, and countries such as Germany and Sweden have taken the lead in deployment. In the U.S., the gaseous fuels renewable fuel standards together with liquid biofuels (federally, only liquid biofuels are included in the Environmental Protection Agency’s “RFS2”[5]), can help develop RNG as a transportation fuel.  

Policies such as California’s GHG offset protocol for methane capture from livestock projects can be adopted in other states – either for voluntary or compliance purposes - to help meet the challenges of limited and costly RNG.[6] In Europe, policies such as the European Union’s (EU) Directives on renewable energy, recycling and landfills, together with National Renewable Action Plans help focus activities and resources toward meeting the EU target for 20% renewables by 2020.

The final challenges to the wider use of RNG for transportation are more technical and relate to quality and common standards:
  • Can RNG be injected into natural gas pipelines? Barriers include lack of a universal definition of trace gases/impurities permitted (RNG composition is dependent on the makeup of the feedstock), and a lack of quality assurance that RNG for transportation use is sufficiently upgraded from biogas.
  • Can RNG or a blend power my natural gas vehicle? Barriers include lack of a common gas specification standard for RNG for transportation (i.e. a vehicle engine standard that clearly identifies allowed or disallowed trace compounds that can affect engine performance and life).[7]
  • The last challenge is practical: how to get the upgraded RNG to the pipeline network, when the best sources for transportation (landfills and livestock) may be far from access points? Here, a combination of incentives and connection standards or obligations can encourage distribution networks and RNG producers to establish cost-effective connections. 


[1] Non-energy crop sources including agricultural waste, landfill gas, and new approaches such as “power to gas” from wind etc. can have considerably smaller footprints.
[2] Floris van Foreest, “Perspectives for Biogas in Europe,” The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, NG 70, December 2012.
[3] National Petroleum Council, Renewable Natural Gas for Transportation: An Overview of the Feedstock Capacity, Economics, and GHG Reduction Benefits of RNG as a Low-Carbon Fuel. Topic Paper #22, NPC Future Transportation Fuels Study, August 1, 2012, p. 13. Accessible at http://www.npc.org/FTF_Topic_papers/22-RNG.pdf.
[4] van Foreest, “Perspectives for Biogas in Europe”, Figure 12.
[5] Environmental Protection Agency, http://www.epa.gov/otaq/fuels/renewablefuels/regulations.htm.
[6] GHG-emitting firms who need to reduce their footprint are thereby encouraged to invest in these offset projects.
[7] An example of a standard that can assist customers and fuel providers alike to understand engine requirements for RNG may be found on the Cummins Westport website – technical bulletin at bottom of page. http://www.cumminswestport.com/biomethane.

June 19, 2013

Photo Diary - NGV Europe 2013 - Gothenburg

Gothenburg, Sweden – the home of Westport Sweden – was host to NGV Europe 2013 from June 11 to 13. Westport exhibited side-by-side with with Volvo Cars as they unveiled the new V60 Bi-Fuel car at the event. Westport is proud to have been the sole supplier of natural gas and biomethane fuel systems to Volvo Car since 2009.

Westport develops and installs natural gas and biomethane systems for the Volvo V70 estate cars, and starting in October, for the Volvo V60. The assembly takes place in Westport’s operations located inside Volvo Car's main Torslander production centre near Gothenburg.

The day before NGV Europe, Westport hosted a tour of its and Volvo Car’s facilities. It included a visit to the Volvo Brand Experience Centre, a ride and drive on the Volvo Test Track and a tour of the Westport Sweden Centre.

Westport hosted a reception for customers, partners, speakers and workshop attendees on Tuesday night at its booth with special guest, Mr. Kenneth Macartney, Ambassador of Canada to the Kingdom of Sweden.


Other highlights included presentations from Ian Scott, Executive Vice President and workshop given by Gordon Exel, Westport’s Vice President, Sales and Marketing at the Vehicles and Vessels workshop.

The Westport booth on opening day of NGV Europe - Tuesday, June 11, 2013.

The Westport reception,  hosted on opening night of NGV Europe.

Ian Scott, Executive Vice President, addresses about 200 people on opening night.

Anders Johansson, Director, Research & Development for Westport Sweden, explains NGV technology in the Westport booth to an attendee.

Executive Vice President Elaine Wong (left) speaks to an attendee in front of the Volvo V60 and V70 cars on display. 

The V70 Bi-Fuel car on display at City Hall for the NGV gala dinner. 

The V70 Bi-Fuel cars available for test driving at the Volvo Test Track for the NGV Study Tour.  


June 10, 2013

Incentives, Grants and Tax Credits: Helping Drive the Adoption of NGVs

As natural gas becomes an increasingly viable alternative to gasoline or diesel in fleet transportation, more countries around the world are offering natural gas vehicle (NGV) tax credits, grants and incentives, enabling a more affordable transition for fleet managers and individuals. These measures are offered by governments - many at the state or provincial levels – as well as by non-governmental agencies. 

In Sweden, the government recently announced the extension of an incentive until 2016 whereby company car buyers receive a 40 per cent reduced tax rate. This makes the cost of NGVs competitive with gasoline or diesel-powered vehicles in that country.

According to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), in recent years, state incentives, including tax credits, grants, and rebates, have supported the deployment of natural gas vehicles and the associated infrastructure. In addition, certain state laws and regulations, such as fleet acquisition requirements, have increased the number of NGVs on the road.

The DOE’s Alternative Fuels Data Center offers a database which allows users to search for natural gas laws and incentives in every state. In addition, the advanced search narrows the parameters even further. Also, the page called   Incentive and Law Additions by Fuel and Technology Type, allows visitors to select specific fuel types and view natural gas incentives and laws according to a specific fuel.

In 2012 alone, over 35 new incentives and laws related to natural gas were added to the database.
In Pennsylvania, the Department of Environmental Protection is leading the Natural Gas Vehicle Program, which was recently widely reported in the media.  The Alternative Fuels Incentive Grant program is currently offering an estimated $10 million in grants. It offers:

An opportunity to propose projects which will convert or purchase natural gas vehicles weighing less than 14,000 pounds as well as convert or purchase electric, propane, or other alternative fuel vehicles of any size.

Pennsylvania is joined by several other states in offering financial incentives to invest in NGVs: Maryland, New York, Wisconsin, Colorado, California, Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana and West Virginia are a few states which also offer programs. Some states, like Texas, offer programs which cover up to 80 per cent of the incremental cost of an NGV; others like California, offer various programs which open periodically when funds are available.

Keith Leech, fleet manager with the City of Sacramento is also the area’s Clean Cities coordinator and chairman. He says the Federal alternative fuel excise tax credit of 50 cents per gallon has enabled his city to double its natural gas fuel infrastructure.

“I’m not sure we could have done it without it,” Leech says.

The City of Sacramento currently operates 100 liquefied natural gas (LNG) refuse trucks with four LNG dispensers.

“We’ve been running natural gas garbage trucks for over 10 years and it’s going great,” he says.
His city also just received a $600,000 grant from the California Energy Commission and he says the number of public fueling stations is also increasing.

In Canada, British Columbia’s FortisBC, the largest investor-owned distribution utility in Canada, has initiated the FORTIS Natural Gas for Transport Incentive Program: they offer incentives for heavy, medium and light duty vehicles.  The government of BC has also recently extended its Clean Energy Vehicles for BC program, which includes incentives for CNG vehicles.

In China, the government has long supported natural gas vehicles by offering incentives at the local and central levels. Since 2006, the country has offered a range of programs aimed at promoting natural gas-based clean transportation for the purpose of reducing emissions, saving energy and ensuring national energy security.

For current information about incentives near you, visit Westport’s new incentives chart: http://www.westport.com/products/engines/15/tax-credits-and-incentives.

Have you been successful in receiving a grant or tax incentive? Tell us about it!

April 26, 2013

The Robust and Evolving RNG Market in the European Union

By Jonathan Morissette and Karen Graham

This is the third in a series of blog posts that highlight the market and environmental potential of renewable natural gas (RNG). Check back over the next several weeks as we explore the issues and opportunities for RNG in the transportation sector.

Our previous two posts explored the processes behind renewable natural gas (RNG) that turn organic material – the same stuff we discard as compost or green waste – into a vehicle fuel that can power natural gas vehicles of all sizes: passenger vehicles, delivery trucks, buses and heavy duty (HD), long haul trucks. In this post we ask: Can RNG meaningfully contribute to the sustainability and energy security needs of the transportation sector?

Looking at the success stories of Europe’s RNG market leaders, it’s clear that the answer is yes. We profile two European nations leading the use of RNG in transportation: Sweden, where over 60 percent of the natural gas used to power their natural gas vehicle fleet (NGVs) is from renewable sources, and Germany, where at the end of last year 119 vehicle fueling stations offered 100 percent RNG.[1]

The long-term energy and transportation policies of the European Commission, together with national strategies and programs, have begun to shape the development of renewable and low-carbon fuels in Europe.

Sweden

RNG for transport is a key strategy in Sweden’s goal to achieve fossil fuel independence in its road vehicle fleet by 2030. EU directives require that 5.75 percent of total oil consumption in Sweden, and 20 percent of transport fuels, must be supplied from renewable sources by 2020.[2]

The Swedish biogas industry was initially formed to meet secure and sustainable heating fuel needs, but now transportation use has outstripped other applications. 43.9 percent of all produced biogas is used as transport fuel, the fastest growing sector for biogas, with a nearly equivalent share used for heating (the remainder is flared or for electricity generation).[3]

Over 60 percent of the methane used in Swedish NGVs is produced in local RNG plants. Over a dozen cities in Sweden have bus fleets fueled entirely by RNG. [4] At the end of 2011 there were over 130 public filling stations. Sweden’s NGV fleet is made up of 36,520 light duty vehicles, 1,530 buses and 550 HD trucks. Last summer Sweden’s first liquefied biomethane station opened in Lidköping to supply transport fuel for heavy duty vehicles.[5]

In a recent study, the total annual Swedish biogas production potential from waste and residual products has been estimated at 15.2 terawatt hours (TWh) of energy, the equivalent of just over 353 million gallons of diesel fuel. Other reports estimate that the Swedish potential for biomethane production from thermal gasification, primarily of forest wastes, is 59 TWh, equivalent to 1.37 billion gallons of diesel fuel.[6]

By the end of 2012, 119 natural gas filling stations across Germany offered 100 percent RNG (more than triple the total in 2011), and RNG blends were offered at 288 filling stations.

Germany

Germany is far and away the European leader in producing biogas and RNG. In 2012 Germany alone was responsible for 61 percent of all biogas produced in Europe. As of 2009 there were 7,090 biogas plants in Germany – 5,905 which were classified as agricultural. 80 percent of all RNG in Germany is produced from agricultural wastes.[7] The high proportion of agricultural biogas shows Germany’s potential for landfill expansion (to date, no biogas plants in Germany are supplied by landfill projects).[8]

In 2012 there were 84 RNG upgrade facilities, 82 of which inject their upgraded gas into pipeline networks.[9] While Germany lags Sweden in its RNG use for transportation, recent gains have been made. Last year, the share of RNG in natural gas for transport increased from 6 percent to over 15 percent, positioning Germany well to meet its national goal of 20 percent renewable gas in transportation by 2020.[10] By the end of last year, 119 natural gas filling stations across Germany offered 100 percent RNG (more than triple the total in 2011), and RNG blends were offered at 288 filling stations.[11]

These success stories show two ways of incorporating RNG into the transportation fuel mix at a commercial scale – Sweden’s use of a wide range of anaerobic sources, compared to Germany’s exclusive reliance to date on agricultural waste. If Germany harnesses its landfill gas sites as biogas sources, it has the potential to add even more renewable capacity using existing anaerobic technology. Both countries are continuing to develop biogas resources and the refuelling infrastructure that promote low-carbon, sustainable and secure transportation fuel networks in the coming years.



[1] NVGA Europe, “Markets & Statistics: Sweden”: available at http://www.ngvaeurope.eu/sweden last accessed March 28, 2013, and NGV Global, “Biomethane Fuel Gains Ground in Germany,” news article (March 31, 2013): available at http://www.ngvglobal.com/biomethane-fuel-gains-ground-in-germany-0331
[2] Vanciu, Gabriela and Nino Miresashvili, “Biogas Cars in Sweden: An Emerging Market,” Jonkoping University (May 2012).
[3] Ibid. (Biogas end-use: 43.90% for gas vehicles, 43.70% for heat, 8.10% flared, and 4.10% electricity; 0.20% being missing data).
[4] NVGA Europe, “Markets & Statistics: Sweden”: available at http://www.ngvaeurope.eu/sweden last accessed March 28, 2013.
[5] Ibid.
[6] Svensson, Mattias, Anneli Peterson and Jorgen Held, “Renewable Methane: An Important Aspect When Establishing a More Diversified Sourcing and Distribution of Energy Gas in Sweden” (2009).
[7] NGV Global, “Biomethane Fuel Gains Ground in Germany,” news article (March 31, 2013): available at http://www.ngvglobal.com/biomethane-fuel-gains-ground-in-germany-0331.
[8] AEBIOM, “European Bioenergy Outlook 2012”.
[9] Ibid.
[10] NGV Global, “Biomethane Fuel Gains Ground in Germany”.
[11] Ibid.

April 8, 2013

Renewable Natural Gas: From Biogas to Gas Tank

By Jonathan Morissette and Karen Graham 
Sustainable Energy Futures at Westport Innovations

This is the second in a series of blog posts that will highlight the market and environmental potential of renewable natural gas (RNG). Check back over the next six weeks as we explore the issues and opportunities for RNG in the transportation sector.

Our previous renewable natural gas (RNG) post was on the technologies currently used to transform organic waste into renewable vehicle fuel. This time, we’re exploring the steps needed to ensure the safe and efficient use of this fuel in natural gas engines.

Upgrading biogas into RNG suitable for engines is a lot like the upgrading processes for natural gas extracted from fossil sources, or even to traditional liquid fuels like gasoline or diesel. No energy source for transportation can be taken in its raw state and put right into an engine. Transport fuels must have impurities removed and their energy content raised to a set level, and RNG is no different.

In the case of RNG, this process involves three key steps: cleaning, compression, and distribution. While none of these steps are unique to RNG, the scale and location of RNG production introduces distinct considerations for producers and operators. The method for upgrading biogas into higher-grade fuel depends on the nature and size of the production facility, be it landfill gas, municipal waste streams or energy crops. Surveys of successful RNG projects in North America and Europe show that no single upgrading technology is preferred, so each site will choose the best technology for its needs.[i]

Regardless of the upgrading methods used, the aim is the same: to remove unwanted gases and moisture. The basic steps include removing water vapor, hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide, as well as removing residual contaminants such as siloxanes and trace gases. This can be accomplished by membrane separation, water scrubbing, chemical absorption, physical adsorption, bio-filtration, or cryogenic separation.

The degree of biogas refinement depends on the end-use, and transportation needs a relatively high degree of purity. Fuel standards for RNG can be established by regional governments or by engine manufacturers themselves. For example, the European Union is currently establishing an EU-wide standard for RNG, and in Austria a trade name called “methaPUR” has been established to market vehicle-quality RNG. [ii] [iii] Cummins Westport offers an online Fuel Quality Calculator that allows customers and fuel providers to be sure that natural gas from any source that meets specifications can safely be used in its engines.

The final stages – compression and distribution – undergo similar processes to conventional natural gas production. The key difference is the variety of scale and location of RNG production sites. Conventional natural gas typically delivers large volumes to large markets, but RNG production facilities can range from the micro- to the medium, to the very large[iv], and their customers can be private truck fleets, public access vehicle fueling stations, or grid-injection for delivery to a wide array of end customers. Some markets for RNG are “closed loop,” where the biogas from a privately-operated landfill powers part of the refuse vehicle fleet owned by the company, while others are much more open. In Sweden, nearly all RNG produced to vehicle engine standards is supplied into the pipeline network.



Whether produced in a closed loop or for public refuelling stations, a distinct advantage of RNG for transportation is that once the biogas has been cleaned and upgraded, it’s interchangeable with conventional natural gas for transportation, giving fuel providers and drivers a flexible range of options.


[i] Petersson, Anneli, and Wellinger, Arthur (2009). Biogas Upgrading Technologies – Developments and Innovations. IEA Bioenergy, Task 37: Energy from Biogas and Landfill Gas.

[ii] http://www.greengasgrids.eu/sites/default/files/files/Biomethane%20standards%20-%20Jacques%20Dubost.pdf

[iii] http://www.methapur.com/

[iv] Waste Management describes its Altamont, California landfill gas site as the largest biofuel supplier in the world, capable of producing 13,000 gallons of liquid natural gas per day.